Gaps in the Safety-Net: Community Health Centers' Diminutive Effect on Having a Regular Source of Care

Abstract

Purpose

This chapter seeks to quantify the effects of geographic access to community health centers on the likelihood of an individual having a regular source of health care.

Methodology/Approach

Utilizing survey and center location data, the analysis employs bivariate cross-tabulation with chi-square and multinominal logistic regression to quantify the relationship between variables.

Findings

While individuals living in close spatial proximity to community health centers were more likely to identify a community health center as a regular source of care as compared with those without proximal access, the effect of community health center access on the identification of any source of regular health care was generally insignificant or negative, except for populations with a chronic medical condition.

Research limitations/implications

While these findings support current literature suggesting that spatial proximity to care is insufficient to transform at-risk populations into regular primary care users, it is important to note that it is possible that individuals prefer to access primary care services outside of their immediate neighborhoods, potentially mediating the observed effect of proximity to care on the likelihood of having a regular source of care. Also, because this analysis is based on cross-sectional survey data, it is impossible to make a causal argument about the relationship between variables. Only the observed association can be asserted and used to inform future studies.

Originality/Value of Paper

Existing research supports a positive association between community health center utilization and measures of health for social groups traditionally facing barriers to care, but few studies isolate the effect of center availability and health, particularly when considering those living in the catchment area but are not regular users. Due to the complexity and prevalence of barriers to health care for vulnerable and at-risk populations, these findings suggest that improving geographic access to primary health care does not guarantee positive outcomes for target groups. The magnitude of social disadvantage on vulnerable and at-risk populations can have a devastating effect on health care outcomes that is not easily overcome by social programs.

Citation

Gadson, D.N. (2023), "Gaps in the Safety-Net: Community Health Centers' Diminutive Effect on Having a Regular Source of Care", Kronenfeld, J.J. (Ed.) Social Factors, Health Care Inequities and Vaccination (Research in the Sociology of Health Care, Vol. 40), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 123-136. https://doi.org/10.1108/S0275-495920230000040007