To read this content please select one of the options below:

To Test or Not to Test?: The Role of Testing in Elementary Social Studies A Collaborative Study Conducted by NCPSSE and SCPSSE

1University of North Carolina—Charlotte, NCPSSE, Members of North Carolina Professors of Social Studies Education (NCPSSE) include the following: Katherine A. O'Connor, Amy Good, Sandra Oldendorf, Jeff Passe, and Sandra Byrd
2Furman University, SCPSSE, Members of South Carolina Professors of Social Studies Education (SCPSSE) include the following: Tim Lintner, Becky Faulkner, Christopher Burkett, Carol McNulty, Kenneth Vogler, and Herman Knopf

Social Studies Research and Practice

ISSN: 1933-5415

Article publication date: 1 July 2006

Issue publication date: 1 July 2006

2551

Abstract

There are growing concerns among social studies professionals that social studies instruction is disappearing from elementary schools. These concerns have become more pressing as educational policies emphasize core curricula of reading, writing, mathematics, and science. Questions arise as to how social studies can resume its traditional role as one of these core curricula. One possibility is to have social studies included in the accountability movement through testing. This article contemplates the role of testing in impacting social studies instruction in the elementary curriculum through a comparative analysis of data collected from a study of practicing elementary teachers in two states: one in which social studies instruction is tested and the other in which social studies instruction is not tested.

Citation

Heafner, T.L., Lipscomb, G.B. and Rock, T.C. (2006), "To Test or Not to Test?: The Role of Testing in Elementary Social Studies A Collaborative Study Conducted by NCPSSE and SCPSSE", Social Studies Research and Practice, Vol. 1 No. 2, pp. 145-164. https://doi.org/10.1108/SSRP-02-2006-B0001

Publisher

:

Emerald Publishing Limited

Copyright © 2006, Emerald Publishing Limited

Related articles