Commentary on “Can active support improve job satisfaction?”

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this paper is to provide a commentary on Rhodes and Toogood’s article on the possible relationship between Active Support training and staff job satisfaction.

Design/methodology/approach

Rhodes and Toogood unusually and importantly include outcomes for both frontline staff and service users following an Active Support intervention. This commentary builds upon this approach by drawing on ideas recently raised by Deveau and McGill (2015).

Findings

A number of important themes are identified including the mutuality of direct support staff (DSS) and service user experience, the significance of considering both the formal and informal aspects of organisational culture and the value of employing a complexity theory perspective.

Originality/value

Effective public services require an understanding of the factors influencing the behaviour of public service staff. In intellectual disability services, positive outcomes can only be obtained through a broader appreciation of the drivers of DSS behaviour, especially the roles played by culture and leadership.

Citation

Deveau, R. (2016), "Commentary on “Can active support improve job satisfaction?”", Tizard Learning Disability Review, Vol. 21 No. 2, pp. 61-64. https://doi.org/10.1108/TLDR-11-2015-0045