To read this content please select one of the options below:

Politics or philosophy — which should we teach?

Edgar Baker (former Staff HMI)

Education + Training

ISSN: 0040-0912

Article publication date: 1 October 1978

783

Abstract

There have been recent proposals that schools should teach politics. In a recent book Political Education and Political Literacy (Longman £3.95), the case is argued at length on behalf of the Hansard Society. It is in effect a report of a working party, chaired by Professor Bernard Crick, in which political literacy is defined as: the skills, knowledge and attitudes to be effective in political situations. The survey reveals that school‐leavers are politically inept and almost totally ignorant. (A quarter of them thought the IRA was a Protestant organisation). The report also recommends that a small core of general politics should be taught to all teachers in training, that all local education committees should have advisers on political education, and that the DES should have its own specialist HMI on the subject. In fact two of these three recommendations have already been adopted in part: an experienced HMI (an historian) has been given responsibility for political education, and Sheffield recently appointed a subject adviser in politics.

Citation

Baker, E. (1978), "Politics or philosophy — which should we teach?", Education + Training, Vol. 20 No. 10, pp. 294-297. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb002015

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1978, MCB UP Limited

Related articles