To read this content please select one of the options below:

RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY OF TENURED AND NONTENURED FACULTY IN U.S. UNIVERSITIES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FOUR FIELDS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS

YORAM NEUMANN (Associate Director, Centre for Applied Social Science and Assistant Professor of Sociology at Boston University. He holds the degrees of B.A., M.B.A. (Tel‐Aviv) and Ph.D. (Cornell). Among his recent publications are articles concerned with organizational research methodologies.)

Journal of Educational Administration

ISSN: 0957-8234

Article publication date: 1 January 1979

73

Abstract

This study examines differences between the tenured and nontenured faculty in research productivity. The major hypothesis tested is that, in a given unit of time, the tenured faculty demonstrates and publishes its research more than the nontenured faculty. The study does not unequivocally verify this hypothesis for published books and articles. Policy implications of these findings in the context of designing an optimal reward system are discussed and explicated.

Citation

NEUMANN, Y. (1979), "RESEARCH PRODUCTIVITY OF TENURED AND NONTENURED FACULTY IN U.S. UNIVERSITIES: A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FOUR FIELDS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 17 No. 1, pp. 92-101. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb009810

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1979, MCB UP Limited

Related articles