To read this content please select one of the options below:

NOTES ON THEORY AND RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: A STUDY OF FACULTY STAFF REACTIONS TO THREE TYPES OF LEADERSHIP

BILL SWAN (Head of the Department of English and History at Gloucester High School, N.S.W. He holds the degrees of B.A. and M.Ed.Admin of the University of New England. Mr. Swan is currently investigating aspects of differentiated staffing for his doctoral degree at Newcastle University.)

Journal of Educational Administration

ISSN: 0957-8234

Article publication date: 1 February 1980

395

Abstract

INTRODUCTION The work of Lewin and his associates showed that the same groups of people behave in distinctly different ways under leaders whose styles differ. Subsequently, many researchers have stressed the efficiency of leadership that emphasizes consideration, mutual identification, and personal influence. Impressive evidence has been mustered in support of this position through a number of studies by staff members of the Child Welfare Research Station at Ohio University and the Institute for Social Research at the University of Michigan. These studies charted the reactions of a range of subjects to different types of supervision with the general objective of contrasting levels of performance associated with three leadership types. The performance criteria were productivity, inter and intra‐job movement, absenteeism, satisfaction with the job situation and personal motivation.

Citation

SWAN, B. (1980), "NOTES ON THEORY AND RESEARCH IN EDUCATIONAL ADMINISTRATION: A STUDY OF FACULTY STAFF REACTIONS TO THREE TYPES OF LEADERSHIP", Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 18 No. 2, pp. 283-287. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb009833

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1980, MCB UP Limited

Related articles