To read this content please select one of the options below:

Why shouldn't merit be paid for?

M.H. Sturt (Manager, Personnel Planning and Salary Policy, IBM UK Ltd.)

Education + Training

ISSN: 0040-0912

Article publication date: 1 October 1975

113

Abstract

These two statements summarise the debate about merit pay, insofar as there is one; unfortunately, to my mind the debate is so muted that the case for merit pay is going by default. It has become the conventional wisdom in the civil service, the nationalised industries, local government and academic life, and in most manual and many clerical jobs, that all on the same grade should be paid the same regardless of ability, effort, or potential. There is the possible variant that fixed increments may take the employee on a more‐or‐less unconditional progression from the minimum to the maximum of his own grade.

Citation

Sturt, M.H. (1975), "Why shouldn't merit be paid for?", Education + Training, Vol. 17 No. 10, pp. 267-268. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb016404

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1975, MCB UP Limited

Related articles