To read this content please select one of the options below:

CHAPMAN AND OTHERS v. GOONVEAN AND ROSTOWRACK CHINA CLAY CO. LTD.

Managerial Law

ISSN: 0309-0558

Article publication date: 1 February 1973

19

Abstract

November 9, 1972 Master and Servant — Redundancy — “Dismissal” — Employees taken to and from work free of charge — Transport discontinued by employers because uneconomical — Employees' notice — No evidence diminished requirements of work — Whether proper test to consider future availability of work if transport continued — Redundancy Payments Act, 1965 (c.62),s.l(2). Industrial Court — Judicial precedent — Whether decisions of Divisional Court binding — Whether Industrial Court bound by own decisions.

Citation

Donaldson, J., Arkell, J.H. and Davies, R. (1973), "CHAPMAN AND OTHERS v. GOONVEAN AND ROSTOWRACK CHINA CLAY CO. LTD.", Managerial Law, Vol. 13 No. 5, pp. 308-318. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022160

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1973, MCB UP Limited

Related articles