A CONTINGENCY MODEL OF MANDATED MEDIATION: LESSONS FROM THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT

Abstract

Over the past decade there has been an upsurge of interest in the study of mediation. Much of the current interest is the consequence of mediation's apparent success in the management of labor‐management conflicts. It is suggested here that a critical examination of mandated mediation—a long standing, but neglected part of negotiation under the Railway Labor Act of 1926—can make substantive contributions to the development of mediation theory. This paper proposes a conceptual model for understanding context, process, and outcome constraints on the performance of mandated mediation.

Citation

Swiercz, P.M. and Flynn, L.P. (1993), "A CONTINGENCY MODEL OF MANDATED MEDIATION: LESSONS FROM THE RAILWAY LABOR ACT", International Journal of Conflict Management, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 61-74. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb022721