To read this content please select one of the options below:

THE RIGHT OF REPLY TO TRANSFRONTIER TELEVISION BROADCASTS: A TWO‐SPEED EUROPE

VINCENT PORTER (PROFESSOR OF FILM AND MEDIA STUDIES AT THE CENTRE FOR COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION STUDIES, UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER)
MARTIN GABRIEL (QUINTIN HOGG DOCTORAL RESEARCH STUDENT AT THE CENTRE FOR COMMUNICATION AND INFORMATION STUDIES, UNIVERSITY OF WESTMINSTER)

Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance

ISSN: 1358-1988

Article publication date: 1 February 1993

57

Abstract

As the Council of Europe and the European Community (EC) both failed to introduce a standard right of reply for transfrontier television broadcasts, national systems prevail. They present no underlying theme common to all jurisdictions. Many EC states offer a complainant the right to have his or her own corrective answer broadcast. A uniform provision for this could have been agreed or failing that, a protocol for a simpler right of correction. The UK Government's unwillingness to accommodate any such rights blocked progress towards standardising procedures. As a result, there is now confusion over the meaning of a right of reply for transfrontier broadcasts and how it should be exercised.

Citation

PORTER, V. and GABRIEL, M. (1993), "THE RIGHT OF REPLY TO TRANSFRONTIER TELEVISION BROADCASTS: A TWO‐SPEED EUROPE", Journal of Financial Regulation and Compliance, Vol. 1 No. 4, pp. 335-346. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb024780

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1993, MCB UP Limited

Related articles