To read this content please select one of the options below:

Bureaucracy as a Leadership Substitute: A Review of History

Foad Derakhshan (California State University, San Bernardino)
Kamal Fatehi (Wichita State University)

Leadership & Organization Development Journal

ISSN: 0143-7739

Article publication date: 1 April 1985

1565

Abstract

It was Weber's belief that bureaucracy and formalisation were the best methods of creating and maintaining a viable political structure independent of its leadership. The need for political stability and the necessity of performance efficiency in a traditional society plagued with inefficiency and chaos were motivating forces behind Weber's pursuit of the ideal organisational model, in which “time” and “individual” would become insignificant elements. The rigidity of bureaucracy would be a substitute for fragile leadership.

Keywords

Citation

Derakhshan, F. and Fatehi, K. (1985), "Bureaucracy as a Leadership Substitute: A Review of History", Leadership & Organization Development Journal, Vol. 6 No. 4, pp. 13-16. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb053580

Publisher

:

MCB UP Ltd

Copyright © 1985, MCB UP Limited

Related articles