Search
  Advanced Search
 
Journal search
Journal cover: Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development

Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development

ISSN: 1462-6004

Online from: 1994

Subject Area: Enterprise and Innovation

Content: Latest Issue | icon: RSS Latest Issue RSS | Previous Issues

Options: To add Favourites and Table of Contents Alerts please take a Emerald profile

Previous article.Icon: Print.Table of Contents.Next article.Icon: .

Schumpeterian versus Kirznerian entrepreneurship: A comparison of academic and non-academic new venturing


Document Information:
Title:Schumpeterian versus Kirznerian entrepreneurship: A comparison of academic and non-academic new venturing
Author(s):Sari Roininen, (Department of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden), Håkan Ylinenpää, (Department of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Luleå University of Technology, Luleå, Sweden)
Citation:Sari Roininen, Håkan Ylinenpää, (2009) "Schumpeterian versus Kirznerian entrepreneurship: A comparison of academic and non-academic new venturing", Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, Vol. 16 Iss: 3, pp.504 - 520
Keywords:Business formation, Entrepreneurialism, Entrepreneurs
Article type:Research paper
DOI:10.1108/14626000910977198 (Permanent URL)
Publisher:Emerald Group Publishing Limited
Abstract:

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to identify how different modes of resource configuration, entry strategy and product/market characteristics affect new ventures' start-up processes as well as outcomes in terms of firm growth and revenues.

Design/methodology/approach – Case studies of three academic spin-offs and three non-academic new ventures are employed as a base for analytical generalisation.

Findings – Non-academic ventures and academic spin-offs have different bases for their venture creation and follow different strategies to enter their specific markets. Academic spin-offs are to a larger extent innovative, product-oriented and enter their target markets employing a technology/science-push strategy, which requires considerable resources and partner cooperation to manage. The non-academic ventures, on the contrary, exploit emerging opportunities on the market through a market-pull strategy relying mainly on offerings already known to the market and building on their own, in-house resources.

Research limitations/implications – Future research should benefit from investigating factors and conditions affecting different ventures' start-up process by utilizing qualitative, in-depth approaches as well as quantitative approaches and a more robust database.

Practical implications – Venture creation processes are not uniform but dependent on situational and contextual factors. Overall, academic spin-offs come forward as examples of Schumpeterian entrepreneurship characterised by exploration and innovation, while the more “Kirznerian” and non-academic start-ups primarily recognise and exploit upcoming market opportunities based on resources they control. The results highlight challenges for nascent entrepreneurs as well as for policy makers supporting new venture creation.

Originality/value – A comparison highlighting critical events, resource configurations and environmental conditions of different start-up processes depending on the new ventures' origin.



Fulltext Options:

Login

Login

Existing customers: login
to access this document

Login


- Forgot password?
- Athens/Institutional login

Purchase

Purchase

Downloadable; Printable; Owned
HTML, PDF (109kb)Purchase

To purchase this item please login or register.

Login


- Forgot password?

Recommend to your librarian

Complete and print this form to request this document from your librarian


Marked list


Bookmark & share

Reprints & permissions