Adaptive leadership

, 65, 67, 69

Aldi

, 43–44

Apple

, 43–44

Australian Awards for University Teaching (AAUT)

, 5

Australian Broadcasting Corporation (ABC)

, 34

Backward why-questioning

, 47, 133

#BlackLivesMatter protests

, 42

Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives

, 54–55

Business

cases

, 4–5

educators

, 20

Carbon neutrality

, 4–5

Case Method

, 3–5, 11, 14, 19, 22, 42

in classrooms

, 53–54

experiential value

, 54–55

knowledge or experience

, 65

as signature pedagogy

, 22–27

structure and formalised approach

, 53

true believers

, 70

Case teaching

, 51

patterns

, 66

stages of adaptive leadership

, 67–69

team

, 65

Case Writing Workshop

, 70–71

Case-based learning

, 10, 51

assessment

, 58–63

Case-teaching resources

feedback templates

, 106

forward-vs. backward-why questioning

, 133

individual case analysis report

, 81, 95, 100–101

instructions and rubrics

, 75

leadership case study based on Everest simulation

, 118–127

teaching team

, 108, 114

team-based case analysis

, 75

team-based report and presentation

, 78–81

why questioning

, 133

worksheets to accompany case study based on Everest simulation

, 129

Cases

, 10–11

analysis report

, 62–63

case-based learners

, 20

case-based teaching and learning

, 3–5

ceding authority in case discussions

, 14–15

exam

, 63

finding and accessing

, 12–13

integrating cases in existing course

, 13–14

Ceding authority in case discussions

, 14–15

Chief Sustainability Officer (CSO)

, 81

Conceptualisation

, 25

Decision time

, 127

Discipline pedagogy

, 17

Discomfort

, 57

Discussion pastures

, 13–14, 53–54

Educators

, 44

pedagogy

, 17

Efficiency

, 7

Engagement

, 6–7

Everest simulation

decision time

, 127

leadership case study based on

, 118, 127

setup

, 118–119

synopsis

, 118

team

, 119, 123, 127

worksheets to accompany case study based on

, 129

Feedback templates

, 106

whole-cohort feedback template

, 106–108

Fellow practitioners

, 4

Forward why-questioning

, 45, 133

Group of Eight universities (Go8 universities)

, 40–42

Harvard Business School (HBS)

, 20

Higher education institutions (HE institutions)

, 4

Implicit and deep structures

, 33–35

evidence of success

, 35–40

preparing to teach with cases

, 40–42

selecting right cases

, 43–44

In-class team-based assessment

, 58–62

Inclusivity

, 7

Individual case analysis report

, 81, 87, 90, 95, 100–101

assignment

, 85–86

C-Suite

, 81–87

essentials

, 84–85

note

, 81

task

, 84

Instructions for case-based assessment

, 75

Issue identification

, 44–45

Jigsaw technique

, 15, 57–58

Leadership case study based on Everest simulation

, 118–127

Learners

, 4, 9, 13, 44–45

Learning

, 9–10, 52

Master of Business Administration (MBA)

, 3–4

learners

, 26

students

, 37–38

McDonald

, 43–44

‘Net Zero’ commitments

, 4–5

North American Case Research Association (NACRA)

, 5

Paul R Lawrence Fellowship Case Research Foundation

, 5

Pedagogy

, 17

Case Method

, 19, 22, 27

signature pedagogy

, 17–19

PESTEL

, 117

Real-world applicability

, 6

Rubrics for case-based assessment

, 75

Scaffolding Case Method

, 43–44

Senior Tutor

, 66–69

Signature pedagogy

, 17–19

Case Method as

, 22–27

Simulation

, 63

Skill development

, 55–56

Skill pastures

, 13–14, 54–55

into classroom activities

, 56–58

Small group discussions (SGDs)

, 53–54

benefits

, 55

Small-and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs)

, 3–4

Socratic approach

, 20

Socratic dialogue techniques

, 20–21

Socratic questioning techniques

, 8, 13–14, 133

Speed

, 7

Student representatives

, 52

Surface structures

, 34

assessing case-based learning

, 58–63

facilitating case-based discussion

, 53–56

skill pastures into classroom activities

, 56–58

Teaching

, 8–9

with cases

, 3–7

philosophy

, 7–15

Teaching team

, 108, 114

team-based feedback templates

, 114–117

whole-cohort feedback template

, 108–114

Team-based case analysis

, 75

Team-based feedback templates

, 114–117

Team-based learning

, 51

Team-based report and presentation

, 78–81

choice of organisations and sources of information

, 78

presentation

, 81

structure

, 78–80

written report

, 80

Theory-application-implication framework (TAI framework)

, 35

Uber

, 43–44

University of Queensland (UQ)

, 22–23, 37–38, 51, 118

University of Queensland Business School (UQBS)

, 13

Versatility

, 6

Whole-cohort feedback template

feedback templates

, 106–108

teaching team

, 108–114

Why-questioning technique

, 39–40, 44, 48, 133

Worksheets to accompany case study based on Everest simulation

, 129

Yushan Bicycles

, 100–101