Index
Virtue Ethics in the Conduct and Governance of Social Science Research
ISBN: 978-1-78714-608-2, eISBN: 978-1-78714-607-5
ISSN: 2398-6018
Publication date: 19 April 2018
This content is currently only available as a PDF
Citation
(2018), "Index", Emmerich, N. (Ed.) Virtue Ethics in the Conduct and Governance of Social Science Research (Advances in Research Ethics and Integrity, Vol. 3), Emerald Publishing Limited, Leeds, pp. 219-226. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2398-601820180000003013
Publisher
:Emerald Publishing Limited
Copyright © 2018 Emerald Publishing Limited
INDEX
Academy of Social Sciences’ (AcSS) symposium
, 108
Academy Working Group on Research Ethics
, 2
Action research
, 145
Applied research
, 145
Aristotelian concept
, 116–117
Aspirational codes
, 54–55
Auditable risk management process
, 70
Audit culture
, 49
Belmont report
, 157
Bioethics model
, 66
British Sociological Association (BSA)
, 1
Canada’s Tri-council policy statement
, 32
Care ethics
, 133–134
Carpenter’s ‘virtue ethics
commentary
, 156–160
democratic rationality
, 142
ethical codes of practice
classroom observation and interviews
, 151
data release access
, 152
participatory action-research
, 150
ethical frameworks
, 146–147
Ford Teaching Project
diagnostic and action-hypotheses
, 150
formulation
, 148
ideas and lines of inquiry development
, 148–149
independent/self-directed thinking
, 147
negative principles
, 148
positive principles
, 148
problems, ideas and evidence
, 149
limitations
, 142–143
moral agency, deliberative inquiry
action research
, 145
applied research
, 145
features
, 144
hypotheses source
, 146
participatory research
, 145
practice-based enquiry
, 145
prescriptive rules
, 143
procedural principles
, 145
qualitative research methodology
, 145
rules of thumb
, 144
principlism
, 142
virtuous research and researcher
, 142
Carpenter’s Virtuous Research Ethics Committee
care ethics
, 133–134
checklists and codes
, 128, 138
cooperation
, 132
decision-making
, 137
deontic and utilitarian ethical approach
, 136
discernment
, 132
ethical assessment
, 128
intelligence
, 132
Macfarlane’s virtuous researcher
, 131–132
perspicacity
, 132
pluralist approach
, 136
reasonableness
, 132
reflexive ethical engagement and teaching
, 130–131
reflexivity
, 132
research ethics tools
, 132
research relationships
, 134–136
rule-based systems
, 137
sensitivity
, 132
trouble with
, 129
Categorical imperative
, 92, 114
Character-based approaches
, 23, 67
Collaborative research
, 36
Conceptual framework
, 4, 8
Concordat to Support Research Integrity
, 74
Conduct-focussed integrity
, 28
Consequentialism
, 113, 114, 181
Contemporary philosophical work
, 199
Context-specific determinations
, 158
Contextual/situational sensitivity
, 201
Cost-benefit analyses
, 113
Democratic rationality
, 142
Deontology
, 114, 181
Duty-based theory
, 92
Economic and Social Research Council
, 164
Ethical codes
, 22
Ethical scrutiny
, 68
formalisation
, 69
Eudaimonia/human flourishing
, 6
Evidence-based practice
, 48
Evolutionary psychology
, 49
Factional political purposes
aspirational codes
, 54–55, 59
audit culture
, 49
collective survival and reproduction
, 57
critically virtuous
, 55–56
disciplinary action
, 52
ethical codes and accreditation mechanisms
, 50
ethics committees
, 58
‘ethnic cleansing,’
, 51
evidence-based practice
, 48
evolutionary psychology
, 49
fundamental attribution error
, 51
individual virtue approach
, 51
Institute of Business Ethics (IBE)
, 53
liberal intellectual tradition
, 56
life-threatening consequences
, 48
Minority Report
, 57
morality
, 60
motives/assign character
, 58
organisational defensive routines
, 53
organisational psychology
, 49
personality characteristics
, 58
planned actions
, 58
replication crisis
, 48
secondary gain
, 49–50
‘selfish gene’ hypothesis
, 57
socialisation
, 57
societal context
, 55
work-related behaviour
, 57
‘Focal’ awareness
, 185
Ford Teaching Project
diagnostic and action-hypotheses
, 150
formulation
, 148
ideas and lines of inquiry development
, 148–149
independent/self-directed thinking
, 147
negative principles
, 148
positive principles
, 148
problems, ideas and evidence
, 149
Form-filling techniques
, 66
Foundational ethical theory
, 24
Fundamental attribution error
, 51
Health and Care Professions Council
, 54
Health Research Authority (HRA)
, 107
Higher education institutions (HEIs)
, 66
Impartial spectator theory
, 95–97
Individual conscience approach
, 93–95
Individual virtue approach
, 51
Institute of Business Ethics (IBE)
, 53
Institutional reputation management
, 68
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)
, 164
Intellectual/cognitive thought dispositions
, 4
Intellectual/theoretical virtues
, 91
Internal organisational behaviour
, 69
Internal Review Boards (IRBs)
, 156, 158–160
‘Iron cage’ concept
, 69
Life-threatening consequences
, 48
Machiavellian approach
, 171
Mid-range theory
, 5
Minority Report
, 57
Moral agency, deliberative inquiry
action research
, 145
applied research
, 145
features
, 144
hypotheses source
, 146
participatory research
, 145
practice-based enquiry
, 145
prescriptive rules
, 143
procedural principles
, 145
qualitative research methodology
, 145
rules of thumb
, 144
Moral philosophy
, 3
modern moral philosophy
, 5
principles of
, 4
universalism of
, 6
Organisational psychology
, 49
Overarching concept
, 26, 31
Participatory action-research
, 150
Participatory research
, 36, 145
Phróēsis
authenticity
, 190
concept of
, 180
elements
characteristics
, 187
ethical skills
, 187
‘focal’ awareness
, 185
intellectual and socio-political context
, 188
‘particularism,’
, 187
reflection and deliberation
, 186
‘tacit knowledge,’
, 185
government policies and institutional initiatives
, 193
habitus
, 181
applied ethics
, 198
‘biomedical’/‘bioethical’ model
, 198
contemporary philosophical work
, 199
contextual/situational sensitivity
, 201
core ethical insights
, 204
degree of cultural acceptance
, 203
eudaimonia/human flourishing
, 202
interpretive pluralism
, 212
‘moral wisdom,’
, 203
normative/action-guiding wisdom
, 203
normativity of
, 205–207
organizational context
, 199
philosophical and theoretical tools
, 199
professional autonomy
, 199
professionalism
, 198–199
quantitative psychology
, 211
research ethics bureaucracies
, 198
social theory
, 200
society conception
, 200
socio-political milieu
, 202
substantive and normative virtues
, 210
synderesis and (moral) habitus
, 207–210
ideal-typical exemplar
, 191
implications
, 191–192
policymaking
, 180
political assumptions and teleological conception
, 190
principles vs. free judgement
, 191
revival of interest
Aristotle’s assumption
, 183
consequentialism and deontology
, 181
decision making
, 183–184
eudaemonia
, 184
features
, 182
occupational tasks
, 182
social and intellectual context
, 185
socio-political context
, 182
technical/ethical regulations
, 182
theoretical inquiry
, 183
variations
, 188–189
Phróēsis cultivation
concept of
, 166–167
Economic and Social Research Council
, 164
vs. ethical regulation
, 173
Aristotelian notion
, 171
codes and procedural statements
, 169
feature
, 168
Machiavellian approach
, 171
process
, 167
qualitative inquiry
, 168
requirements
, 170
training and development
, 169
‘virtue’ conception
, 171
Institutional Review Boards (IRBs)
, 164
medical and psychological research
, 165
non-experimental research
, 172
occupational activities
, 164
rules/procedures
, 165
transparent accountability
, 164, 171
Phronimos
, 7
Practice-based enquiry
, 145
Principle-based approach
, 23
Professional integrity
autonomous rational agents
, 92
bioethics
, 85
‘categorical imperative,’
, 92
duty-based theory
, 92
ethical code
, 84
health and social care
, 84
impartial spectator
, 95–97
individual conscience approach
, 93–95
intellectual/theoretical virtues
, 91
morality
, 85
moral theories
, 91
motivations and trustworthiness
, 85
nonemergency medical treatment
, 84
participants access
autonomy principle
, 87
ethical approval
, 86
ethical dimension
, 89
formulaic approach
, 88
self-explanatory
, 88
short-term responsibilities
, 88
principles
, 89–90
professionalism
, 90
‘Smithian categorical imperative,’
, 92–93
human nature, universal law
, 98
moral reasoning
, 98
Moral Sentiment
, 99
mutual relations
, 97
quality
, 98
Qualitative research methodology
, 145
Quantitative psychology
, 211
Quasi-ethical issues
, 107
Reflection-on-reflection-in-action
, 4
Regulatory-based process
, 67
Researcher integrity
Canada’s Tri-council policy statement
, 32
care
, 34
character-based approaches
, 23
characteristics
, 35
collaborative and participatory research
, 36
compliance discourses
, 34–35
conduct-focussed integrity
, 28
contradictions and conflicts
, 29
courage
, 34
critical and emotional commitment
, 35
critical reflexivity
, 30
ethical codes
, 22
ethics work
, 35
forum theatre
, 37–39
foundational ethical theory
, 24
‘fragile balance,’
, 28
guidance and policies
, 22
human flourishing
, 30
ideals and values situation
, 35
justice
, 34
moral agents, character/moral dispositions
, 23
moral case deliberation
, 36–37
neo-socratic dialogue
, 37
phronesis
, 33–34
principle-based approach
, 23
real life cases
, 36
‘reliable accountability,’
, 29
research ethics committees (RECs)
, 22
research integrity
elements of
, 27–28
overarching concept
, 26, 31
research practice
, 27
respectfulness
, 34
rule-based approach
, 39–40
semi-independent ideal
, 30
service/regulative ideal
, 30
‘situationist critique,’
, 25
standards vs. reflexive commitment
, 23
support development
, (See Support development)
trustworthiness
, 34
versions of
, 31–32
virtue-based approach
, 23
virtue cultivation
, 35
virtue theory
, 25
Western philosophy
, 23
Research ethics
, 2
factional political purposes
aspirational codes
, 54–55, 59
audit culture
, 49
collective survival and reproduction
, 57
critically virtuous
, 55–56
disciplinary action
, 52
ethical codes and accreditation mechanisms
, 50
ethics committees
, 58
‘ethnic cleansing,’
, 51
evidence-based practice
, 48
evolutionary psychology
, 49
fundamental attribution error
, 51
individual virtue approach
, 51
Institute of Business Ethics (IBE)
, 53
liberal intellectual tradition
, 56
life-threatening consequences
, 48
Minority Report
, 57
morality
, 60
motives/assign character
, 58
organisational defensive routines
, 53
organisational psychology
, 49
organisational system
, 50
personality characteristics
, 58
planned actions
, 58
replication crisis
, 48
secondary gain
, 49–50
‘selfish gene’ hypothesis
, 57
socialisation
, 57
societal context
, 55
work-related behaviour
, 57
individual research integrity
, 46
Social Identity Theory
, 46
social reality
, 46
Research ethics committee (rec)
, 9
Research Ethics Committees (RECs)
, 22, 67, 156
Research ethics tools
, 132
Research governance frameworks
, 112
Rule-based systems
, 39–40, 137
‘Selfish gene’ hypothesis
, 57
Service/regulative ideal
, 30
‘Smithian categorical imperative,’
, 92–93
human nature, universal law
, 98
moral reasoning
, 98
Moral Sentiment
, 99
mutual relations
, 97
quality
, 98
Social Identity Theory
, 46
Stoicism
, 3
Support development
‘auditable’ regulatory requirements
, 66
auditable risk management process
, 70
bioethics model
, 66
character-focussed approach
, 67
compliance culture
, 67
Concordat stipulates
, 72
Concordat to Support Research Integrity
, 74
ethical scrutiny
, 68
formalisation
, 69
ethics creep
, 68, 70
form-filling techniques
, 66
higher education institutions (HEIs)
, 66
‘institutionalised distrust,’
, 70
institutional reputation management
, 68
internal organisational behaviour
, 69
‘iron cage’ concept
, 69
legislative requirements
, 68
‘medical model,’
, 66
moral decision-making skills
, 67
policy documents
, 68
reflectively and reflexively
, 77
regulatory-based process
, 67
Research Ethics Committee (REC)
, 67
research funding applications
, 68
responsibilities and commitments
, 67
structural pressures
, 72
tick-box review process
, 70
training
, 71
administrator-led instruction
, 74
‘vicious circle’ effect
ethical researcher
, 75–77
unethical researcher
, 73–74
virtue ethics approach
, 71–72
virtue ethics training model
, 77–79
Tick-box review process
, 70
Transparent accountability
, 164, 171
UK Association for Research Ethics
, 111
UNESCO code of conduct
, 157
‘Vicious circle’ effect
ethical researcher
, 75–77
unethical researcher
, 73–74
Virtue cultivation
, 35
Virtue ethics training model
, 77–79
Virtuous ethics committee
academic discipline
, 109
Academy of Social Sciences’ (AcSS) symposium
, 108
application
, 112
Aristotelian concept
, 116–117
autonomy
, 115
autonomy and justice
, 110
categorical imperative
, 114
checklists and typical applications
, 122
commentary
Belmont report
, 157
context-specific determinations
, 158
function
, 156–157
Internal Review Boards (IRBs)
, 156, 158–160
non-virtue-based approach
, 156
principle- and code-based approach
, 156
Research Ethics Committees (RECs)
, 156
research protocols
, 160
UNESCO code of conduct
, 157
consequentialism
, 113, 114
cost-benefit analyses
, 113
deontology
, 114
documents content
, 119
ethical boundaries
, 107
ethical conduct
, 113
ethical dispositions and motives
, 106
ethnography
, 112
eudaimonia
, 116
face-to-face contact
, 122
front-loaded review
, 110
Health Research Authority (HRA)
, 107
individual consent and confidentiality
, 106
law and policy
, 107
limiting analyses
, 114
moral analyses
, 114
moral excellence
, 120
normative ethical position
, 109
normative theoretical position
, 107
online sexual exploitation
, 121
phronesis
, 116
practical guidance
, 118
principlism
, 109
psychosocial pressures
, 122
quasi-ethical issues
, 107
regulatory constraints
, 111
research governance frameworks
, 112
research participants
, 114
research phase
, 118
reviewing phase
, 118
systematic application
, 115
systematic approach
, 107
test conformity/compliance
, 109
UK Association for Research Ethics
, 111
utilitarianism
, 112
virtues and vices
, 119
Western philosophy
, 23
Work-related behaviour
, 57
- Prelims
- Introduction: Virtue and the Ethics of Social Research
- Section 1: Virtue and Integrity in Social Science Research
- Chapter 1: Cultivating Researcher Integrity: Virtue-Based Approaches to Research Ethics
- Chapter 2: Questioning the Virtue of Virtue Ethics: Slowing the Rush to Virtue in Research Ethics
- Chapter 3: Research Ethics Training: Using a Virtue Ethics Approach to Training to Support Development of Researcher Integrity
- Chapter 4: The Professional Integrity of Social Science Researchers – can Virtue Ethics Help?
- Section 2: Virtue and the Review/Governance of Social Science Research
- Chapter 5: Virtue Ethics in the Practice and Review of Social Science Research: The Virtuous Ethics Committee
- Chapter 6: Relating to Carpenter’s Virtuous Research Ethics Committee
- Chapter 7: A Response to David Carpenter’s ‘Virtue Ethics in the Practice and Review of Social Science Research’
- Chapter 8: Commentary On: Virtue Ethics in the Practice and Review of Social Science Research: The Virtuous Ethics Committee by David Carpenter
- Section 3: Phrónēsis in the Practice/Conduct and Review/Governance of Social Scientific Research
- Chapter 9: Ethical Regulation of Social Research Versus The Cultivation of Phrónēsis
- Chapter 10: Is Phrónēsis Necessarily Virtuous?
- Chapter 11: From Phrónēsis to Habitus: Synderesis and the Practice(s) of Ethics and Social Research
- Index